This script provides the functionality to e-mail this page. This functionality will not be available.

 

Best Practice Intervention Package (BPIP)

Physician Relationships Survey Summary

                       

1.      Which states had the highest participation in the BPIP survey based on number of state agencies participating in the HHQI campaign?

           Alaska, Nevada, Oregon, Missouri and Wyoming

 2.      Which states had 15 or more agencies participate in the BPIP survey?                                
          
          Texas, Pennsylvania, Illinois, Missouri, Florida, Minnesota, Oklahoma, Indiana and Ohio

 3.      How many of the survey participants currently conducted physician surveys?

          40%

 4.      How many survey participants anticipated incorporating elements from one of the physician/office staff surveys featured in the package?

           76%

 5.      How many survey participants provide opportunities for clinicians to meet primary referring physicians face to face?

          57% are currently completing this strategy

          22% are considering implementing this strategy

 6.      How many survey participants utilize a ‘Tickler File’ (or some type of method) so staff can identify physician’s preferences for communication?

           24% utilize some type of method to identify physicians’ communication preferences

           27% do not utilize some type of method to identify physicians’ communication preferences

           49% are considering implementing some type of method to identify physicians’ communication preferences

 7.      How many of the survey participants provide information to physicians regarding Physician Care Plan Oversight (CPO)?

           54%

 8.      How do survey participants ensure that their clinical nurses have the most current knowledge of symptom management, pharmacology and evidence-based practice guidelines?

           96% In-services

           60% External conferences

           32% Required reading of journal articles

 


 

Here are some other ways the survey participants ensure that clinical nurses have the most current knowledge of symptom management, pharmacology and evidence-based practice guidelines:

  • Competency testing in a myriad of areas including computer-based training
  • Updating evidence-based clinical guidelines
  • Poster boards
  • Providing CNEs for internal presentation
  • e-learning programs
  • Educational newsletters
  • Intranet sessions; Web-based seminars
  • Skills labs
  • Dramas and games
  • Brown bag lunch seminars
  • Physician educator
  • Resource file on server
  •  

    • Web sites with current information
    • Online articles
    • Offering tuition reimbursement
    • Non-required reading
    • Annual needs survey to determine educational needs
    • Self-directed studies
    • Case conferences
    • Ongoing best practices education
    • Teleconferences
    • Updates from QIO
    • Nursing journals

     

     

               

    The feature tool of this BPIP was SBAR—39 percent of survey participants were already using SBAR and another 37 percent are anticipating implementing SBAR. Here are some successes or barriers that participating HHAs have experienced with SBAR:

    Attempted to utilize the SBAR format in a written form to fax to a physician. We are redesigning the tool to allow for multiple scenarios.

    We get quicker response to requests and physicians appreciate the extra effort to provide essential background and offer prudent solutions to patient complaints. It takes a load off the doctors.

    The SBAR has helped decrease our ER trips, which in turn has reduced our ACH rate.

    Faxing of SBAR forms is beginning to be successful.

    Of course at first the staff was very defensive about yet another piece of paper to fill out, but once they completed it, they felt it was an excellent tool to have and use.

    Successes:  Favorable response when speaking directly with physician or PA

    Barrier:  Inability to speak with physician resulting in VM messages answered by office staff.

    Physicians are very receptive to the use of SBAR. In the last 6 months, our hospital as a whole has required that all physician interaction per phone be done in SBAR format.

    We have only found successes, physicians have informed us that it’s easy to speak with the staff, they present facts clearly and they state they know patients get concise information from the staff. This enhances their (physician’s) comfort with prescribing treatment changes and knowing the patient will be monitored and they will be kept informed of changes.

    This package could not have come at a more perfect time. We just completed educating our entire staff, including clerical and billing, on the SBAR as part of our Organizational Culture Plan of Action to improve communication. The package will help reinforce what we have taught. We are going to survey staff and physicians on the use of the SBAR and get their feedback on how to improve it.

    Both our HH & hospice staff have been educated on SBAR, now our preferred method of communication, within the past six months. This came about as a result of our combined HH & hospice "Organizational Culture Team." Our lowest domain was "Communication" and we chose SBAR as our improvement model.

     

    From the QIOSC staff:  Many, many agencies commented that they were modifying the SBAR tools — even making their own acronym. This is fine – SBAR is an effective and concise communication tool. Using it as a model and enhancing the tool to fit your needs is fine — even encouraged!